Leave No Oil Company Behind
Unbelievable. Republicans once again put the interests of the most profitable corporations first, and Democrats cower and bow to their demands.
Senate Republicans block energy bill
Senate Republicans Block Energy Bill, Opposing Taxes on Oil Companies
H. JOSEF HEBERT
AP NewsDec 13, 2007 10:40 EST
Senate Republicans blocked a broad energy bill Thursday because it included billions of dollars in new taxes on the biggest oil companies.
Democratic leaders fell one vote short, 59-40, in getting the 60 votes needed to overcome a GOP filibuster. Democrats said they would strip the taxes from the legislation to move the bill forward.
Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada said he hoped to get the revised energy package approved later in the day, including the first increase in automobile fuel efficiency in three decades and massive increases in the use of ethanol as a motor fuel.
He said we will "eliminate the tax title."
Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky predicted the revised bill would be approved with wide bipartisan support.
The legislation, if passed by the Senate, would have to be voted on by the House, which a week ago approved legislation that included the $21 billion tax increases with revenues marked for promoting renewable fuels and energy efficiency.
But Senate Republicans stood firm on opposing the tax increases, which they said would guarantee a veto by President Bush.
McConnell chided Democrats for pushing a "massive tax increase" that he said "they knew would never be signed into law" because of the president's opposition.
Reid countered that the Senate shouldn't back away from the needed tax measures "just because the president doesn't like it."
"We must begin to break our country's addiction to oil," Reid said.
Comments
And, please, don't come talking to me about 'record profits,' either. Nobody who works in any business is ever going to pay taxes out of their profits - they're going to raise their prices so as to keep their profits in their pockets.
Since then profits have gone up. To use Exxon as an example, here are their approximate annual profits for the years 2002-2006:
2002: $12 Billion
2003: $22 Billion
2004: $25 Billion
2005: $36 Billion
2006: $39 Billion
To be sure-- there's nothing wrong with making profit-- even record profit. But if a company is that successful-- more than tripling their profit in 5 years-- should the American taxpayer really be forgoing royalty payments and subsidizing tax cuts for that company?
Why are we subsidizing the country's most successful and profitable company?